Know what bugs me about your website?
Okay… I’m not a web programmer.. Not even close. I do love tinkering with new toys though.
I do, however, want to start a series of blog post aimed to help ministries look at improving their websites.
Let’s start the discussion.
You know what bugs me about your website?… (that’s going to be the name of it!)
The fact that it’s 2 in the morning and my wife is asleep beside me, I go to your website to see if you have updated and OUTTA NOWHERE, music starts playing.. and there’s no “MAKE IT STOP” button! From then, I’m scared to go to your website while I’m at work or late at night! Do me a favor, if you are not going to ask me if I want to hear your song before you start blasting it at me, at LEAST put a big ol’ STOP button somewhere that’s easy to find.
I love you anyway!

Your turn… what bugs you?
You also might like these posts:
Please enter your name and email below. We never give away, trade or sell your information. We don't like SPAM, and you can unsubscribe anytime.
Loading...
Amen. Even the stop button should be in a very visible place. Too often I have been scrambling to find where on the page the music is and it takes too many seconds to do so.
Thanks for the comment Quartet-Man!
Thanks Kevin,
You were one of the reasons we chose not to put a media player on our site intro.
Great advice keep it coming
Curtis Hagy
Brothers Forever
Thanks Curtis… The story I told on the post was a true one… I hate waking Janna up! lol
Thanks for the comment bro.
I will make this post required reading for all my website clients! I, too, absolutely hate music that plays automatically. Can’t wait to see if your other points match up with mine.
I agree, I don’t like being in bed or in a quiet place like a library, and view a sight with blasting music. It might be ok if it was like a video that was muted at the beginning, but there needs to be some stop or pause button.
I know Colton. I woke my cat up the other day with a website. That takes some doing. I kept hitting the “back button” after reading bios on the group, and that dang song kept playing. My cat was not happy. Neither was Janna. It was late. lol
My complaint is of a slightly different nature. I just visited an artist’s website a moment ago. I wanted to hear their music. Shouldn’t samples of music be an obvious component of a recording artist’s website? I finally clicked on the “Store” tab and found a picture of their one and only album. There was no listing of the song titles from the project and no way to hear the project. But there was a big “Buy Now” button….EXCUSE ME? WHY would I purchase something I’ve never heard? This was a new group with no reputation to rely on – trying to stir up interest in what they have to offer. The site itself looked slick. But no one is going to schedule a group based on the appearance of their website alone. Sadly, I’ve seen this same disregard for the obvious on well-established group’s websites. PEOPLE….you’re not selling your vacation photos, your travel agenda, your blogging skills or your favorite recipes…you’re marketing your GIFT: MUSIC! We gotta hear to want it.
Thanks Marty! I’m probably guilty of what you are saying (in a round about way). I have some sheet music that I don’t have the key or type of arrangement listed. I just quickly put it on the “store” page as an experiment.
Thanks for keeping ME accountable.
Keep the comments coming!
If you combine Kevin and Marty’s comments you have “perfect.”
Have your music available to listen to, just don’t blast it on intro. Therefore, I recommend that all artists retain their media players (with full songs preferably), but have them set with optional PLAY buttons, instead of automatic blast.
Well said, Tyler. Thanks.
Please tell me you’re going to talk about Flash next…
What bugs you about Flash Chris? I’m somehow a little disappointed when I see an “all flash” site.. you?
I’m under the belief that a little goes a long way. I’m in no way against flash – I think it does LOOK great – but like my mom said – load time, lost content, etc. really takes away from a site, IMHO.
I find through my own experiences that usually the only people that like as much flash as some sites have are the owners themselves. Most surfers don’t care as long as the site looks clean and contains the information they are seeking. (Why do you think Wikipedia is so popular?)
clean is the new flashy, huh… like twitter
LOL, Chris…
Kimberly – as a web designer you know. It sometimes just gets way out of hand…
Let me put my two cents in on flash. Takes too long to load, you can’t right-click to open in a new window on links, you can’t identify link urls without opening the window (I could go on). Flash looks pretty (sometimes) but the web is about content first. Flash makes the content the least important factor of the website. I had 3 browser crashes this week because of flash.
A little bit goes a long way.
I found this cool website that would pull up what your website looked like in ANCIENT years (3 web years ago..lol)
Vinerecordsonline.com ’s original site was ALL flash… it wouldn’t pull it up… just a big ol black page with the little (…loading) thing… kinda sad. I would have like to have seen it.
Yes… Flash can be used in a way that becomes obnoxious as well as borderline tasteless. I believe the ooh and awe factor have a lot to do with the appeal of it for the general public (with hi-speed connections). However, as a web designer seeking both the need to create that experience with the flash and make a site that is retrievable and navigable in multiple platforms, implementing static, dynamic and mobile site viewing options in the future are going to become necessities should the consumer desire the effect.
In my experience the appeal of the flash comes from the site owner, not the site user. The site owner likes the appeal of the ooh and ahh and thinks they are cutting edge, while the user is frustrated by the limitations of the flash.
Now mobile, I believe, is the wave of the future and should be the biggest concern for the owners.
I do not design websites but I would think that if your point in designing a site is communication that you would want to pare down everything that you want people to know about your group so that it is simple. I hate going to website where you have to wait for everything to load before the page will scroll. I have a decent computer with a decent processor. If I have to sit looking at a screen that says “loading” for more than a few seconds when I visit the site the content had better be incredible. People tend to make initial value judgements about the quality of items or websites or people within seconds after their first sensory introduction to them. If that first few seconds of visiting a group’s website is spent looking at a screen that says “Please Wait” or “Loading” their judgement is likely to be that the site and the group it is communicating about is slow and clunky. As the old saying goes, “You only get one chance to make a first impression.”
I also hate sites that will not work unless you have the very newest plug-in from flash or some other codec. Or, if you are using an older computer (Win 98 or XP) and the site will not load at all. Build sites that will run on any computer built in the last 10 years at least.
That’s some good stuff Chris. I heard today that Amazon has spent millions of dollars researching how many seconds they have before losing a sale… my friend told me that even a 3rd of a second mattered..
It’s important because statistically, you have less than 10 seconds to tell what you are about and what you would like them to do…
… and they spend 5-6 seconds watching it load!
There are website gurus that do studies and they have found that new potential “customers” will only stay on your site for a few seconds waiting on it to load before they move onto the next. If your site takes 20 or 30 seconds to load you have already lost a lot of people. Not everyone has the fastest computers or fastest internet connections and that has to be compensated for. There are nice, tasteful ways to build a site that is professional that doesn’t have a lot of junk on it.
Here is another thing that maybe you guys can speak to. Again having a college level computer based degree, another thing we discussed is busyness and poor layout. There are some sites that will remain nameless, that when you bring them up your eyes don’t know where to go. You are automatically hit with information overload. That is just as much a turn off to me as the immediate music and flash. If it is not streamlined and not well organized, I probably will not hang around for long. I dont want to stay there for an eternity looking for something that I need. I will go somewhere else and find it.
PREACH IT. I agree! I tend to gravitate toward sites that are very clean and uncluttered… it could be that that is what I’m pursuing in my own life.